Eat fish to prevent blindness in old age

June 10th, 2009

By Sridhar Nadamuni

If you want to keep eye disease at bay, there is nothing better than fish: Two to three portions of fatty fish eaten weekly could help prevent worsening of the age related eye disease, macular degeneration, according to research published online in the British Journal of Ophthalmology on June 9, 2009.

In the Age Related Eye Disease Study, Dr Chung-Jung Chiu, of the Laboratory for Nutrition and Vision Research, at Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and colleagues monitored almost 3,000 participants on a nutritional intervention for the development of age-related macular degeneration over eight years.

Age related macular degeneration, or AMD, a progressive degenerative condition, is a ‘devil in detail’ affecting the back of the eye (macula). With increasing age, the disease can lead to blindness eventually.

The researchers allocated the study participants randomly to receive either a daily dummy pill (placebo); or antioxidants of vitamins C (500 mg), E (400 IU), and beta carotene (15 mg); or the minerals zinc (80 mg) and copper (2 mg); or the antioxidants plus zinc.

Based on the trial results, the researchers suggest that taking antioxidants along with minerals curbed progression of late stage, but not early stage disease.

The participants’ dietary habits were assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire and regular general physical and eye exams as well as detailed photographs of the macula, taken at the start of the study, after two years and then again annually.

The researchers found that the progression to both dry and wet forms of advanced disease was 25% less likely among those eating a diet rich in omega 3 fatty acids (docasahexenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA) acids), regardless of the participants taking supplements. However, a combination of supplements and a high intake of DHA may not halt the progress of early stage disease.

A diet rich in omega 3 in this study (64 mg/day or more of DHA and 42.3 mg/day of EPA) is much lower than the recommended combined total daily intake of 650 mg/day.

But then, the combined intake of all the antioxidant vitamins plus zinc, as well as 2.2 mg or more of beta carotene daily led to more likelihood (50% more) to progress to advanced disease.

A diet rich in low glycaemic index (GI, a measure of how fast carbohydrates are converted into sugars in the intestine and enter the blood) foods, such as wholegrain bread, five slices daily might reduce almost 8% of advanced age related macular degeneration over five years. A diet of high omega 3 and low GI carbohydrate intake reduced the risk of progression to advanced disease by 50%.

The authors advise eating two to three servings of fatty fish, such as salmon, tuna, mackerel, shellfish, and herring every week, to achieve the recommended daily intake of omega 3, substantially cutting the risk of both early and late stage AMD.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • co.mments
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • eKudos
  • Faves
  • feedmelinks
  • Global Grind
  • HealthRanker
  • Hemidemi
  • kick.ie
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Webnews.de
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • YahooMyWeb

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Helps Prevent Depression Among At-Risk Teens

June 2nd, 2009

Adolescent-onset depression is strongly associated with chronic and recurrent depression in adulthood. Researchers now find that adolescent depression is amenable to group cognitive behavioral intervention, compared to the usual standard of care, although this effect was not seen for adolescents with a parent with current depression, according to a study published in the June 3, 2009 issue of JAMA.

In a multicenter trial including 316 adolescent (age, 13-17 years) offspring of parents with current or prior depressive disorders, Judy Garber, Ph.D., of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., and colleagues examined the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral (CB) program for preventing depression. The participants with a past history of depression, current elevated but subdiagnostic depressive symptoms, or both were randomly assigned to the CB prevention program (n = 159) or to usual care (n = 157). Using questionnaires and clinical interviews to measure symptoms and disorders respectively, the investigators performed assessments at the beginning of the study, after the 8-week intervention 90-minute group therapy sessions (followed by six monthly continuation sessions). During the therapy adolescents were taught problem-solving skills and cognitive restructuring techniques to identify and challenge unrealistic and overly negative thoughts.

The findings suggested that the rate for new depressive episodes was lower for those in the CB prevention program than for those in usual care through the post-continuation follow-up (21.4 percent vs. 32.7 percent). The CB program was significantly better than usual care in preventing depressive episodes if a parent did not have a current depressive episode (11.7 percent vs. 40.5 percent). When parents were actively depressed at the start of the study, rates of youth depression did not differ significantly between the CB program and usual care (31.2 percent vs. 24.3 percent).

Children of currently depressed parents had a significantly higher rate of incident depression than adolescents of currently nondepressed parents. Within the usual care group, rates of depression did not differ significantly between offspring of currently depressed vs. nondepressed parents.

“… these positive findings support the clinical utility of this CB prevention program as a preventive intervention to reduce or delay the incidence of depression in offspring of depressed parents. Most youth in the current study had a history of depression and thus the CB prevention program prevented recurrence. Therefore, this program may be useful as a continuation or maintenance intervention,” the authors write.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • co.mments
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • eKudos
  • Faves
  • feedmelinks
  • Global Grind
  • HealthRanker
  • Hemidemi
  • kick.ie
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Webnews.de
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • YahooMyWeb

Likelihood of Survival May Be Improving For Extremely Preterm Infants

June 2nd, 2009

Advances in perinatal and neonatal medicine have led to increasing survival of infants born extremely preterm, with about 70 percent of infants born alive between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation in Sweden surviving at least one year, according to a study in the June 3, 2009 issue of JAMA.

Interventions such as treatment with antenatal tocolytics (drugs that delay or halt labor) or corticosteroids, surfactants (fluids that are produced shortly before birth and prevent the lung from filling with water) within 2 hours after birth significantly reduced the risk of infant death.

To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants, Karel Maršál, M.D., Ph.D., of Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, and colleagues studied 305,318 infants, of which 1,011 were extremely preterm infants (incidence, 3.3/1000 infants) born before 27 gestational weeks in Sweden during 2004-2007, in 904 deliveries to 887 mothers, with 102 multiple births. Of the infants in the study, 707 were live-born and 304 stillborn.

The findings revealed that overall survival at 1 year of age for infants born alive was 70 percent: for those born at 22 weeks it was 9.8 percent; at 23 weeks 53 percent; at 24 weeks 67 percent; at 25 weeks 82 percent; and at 26 weeks 85 percent. Of the 104 deaths occurring at least 24 hours after admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, 42 (40 percent) were due to withdrawal of intensive care. Almost 45% of 1-year survivors had no major neonatal illness. Of the 210 live-born infants (30 percent) who died before the age of 1 year, 152 (22 percent) died during the early neonatal period (0-6 days) including 58 (8.2 percent) who died in the delivery room; and 35 (5 percent) who died during the late neonatal period (7-27 days).

“The most important finding in this study is the high survival of extremely preterm infants born alive. Survival rates at hospital discharge in recent population-based studies have been reported as 0 percent at 22 weeks, 6 percent to 26 percent at 23 weeks, and 29 percent to 55 percent at 24 weeks,” the authors write.

Increase in gestational age reduced the proportion of stillbirths, delivery room deaths, neonatal deaths, and infant deaths. For infants who survived 28 days, no significant association between gestational age at birth and 1-year survival could be detected.

“In summary, overall 1-year survival was 70 percent in extremely preterm infants born alive at 22 to 26 weeks of gestation in Sweden during 2004-2007. Proactive perinatal management is likely to have contributed to this outcome. Therefore, non-initiation or withdrawal of intensive care for extremely preterm infants cannot be based solely on a notion of unlikely survival. This is not to suggest that all extremely preterm live-born infants should be kept alive at any cost. The prognosis, based on an individual assessment, including early and subsequent morbidities, and parental desires are still the most important factors in decision making,” the authors conclude.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • co.mments
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • eKudos
  • Faves
  • feedmelinks
  • Global Grind
  • HealthRanker
  • Hemidemi
  • kick.ie
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Webnews.de
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • YahooMyWeb

Childhood Health Disparities Can Have Life-Long Health Effects

June 2nd, 2009

By Sridhar Nadamuni

Starting Health Promotion, Disease Prevention Early In Life Important

The seeds of later life and disease prevention may have been laid early in childhood, according to research published in June 3, 2009 issue of JAMA. The researchers show that physical and mental stress in childhood may have life-long adverse health effects.

Jack P. Shonkoff, M.D., of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., and colleagues explored the possibility of intervening early in life in an effort to reduce the population-level burden of chronic morbidity and premature death.

“Investigators have postulated that early experience can affect adult health in at least 2 ways—by accumulating damage over time or by the biological embedding of adversities during sensitive developmental periods. In both cases, there can be a lag of many years, even decades, before early adverse experiences are expressed in the form of illness.”

As psychologically and physically stressful events and trauma accumulate over the years starting with childhood, chronic disease and health impairment in adult years is inevitable. According to the researchers, almost all the major diseases such as coronary artery disease, chronic pulmonary disease, cancer, alcoholism, depression, and drug abuse, as well as overlapping mental health problems, teen pregnancies, and cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, physical inactivity, and smoking can be traced to traumatic childhood events.

Intervention in adulthood is far more difficult and almost impossible to completely reverse the neurobiological and health consequences of certain risk factors, such as growing up in poverty, say the authors. “Early experiences of child maltreatment and poverty have been associated with heightened immune responses in adulthood that are known risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma, and chronic lung disease.” Indeed, the formative and impressionable years of childhood and adolescence are critical to environmental impacts.

In some cases, the cumulative burden of multiple risk factors early in life may limit the effectiveness of interventions later in life, thereby making it impossible they write.

Health promotion strategies and disease prevention efforts to reduce stress among vulnerable sections of children and their parents cannot be overstated. Towards that end, the researchers advocate the “design and implementation of new approaches for both the prevention and treatment of toxic stress (such as from extreme poverty, recurrent physical and/or emotional abuse) and its consequences, beginning in the early childhood years; using high-quality early childhood programs to address the stress-related roots of social class disparities in health; and having child welfare services implement health promotion practices.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blogosphere News
  • Blogsvine
  • description
  • co.mments
  • De.lirio.us
  • description
  • eKudos
  • Faves
  • feedmelinks
  • Global Grind
  • HealthRanker
  • Hemidemi
  • kick.ie
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Webnews.de
  • Wikio FR
  • Wikio IT
  • YahooMyWeb
KNOW YOUR HEALTH, SHAPE YOUR DESTINY